Following my post about the WJC last week, I've had an email from a reader defending the WJC's honesty, arguing that the media has not covered the controversy either fairly or adequately, and wondering whether Herbits's controversial comments were perhaps the result of sheer frustration that after four internal audits and a long document explaining the issues under discussion, he is still discussing and defending the same points.
I agree that the media has not adequately covered the WJC's side of the story, if at all, and refer readers to the WJC's lengthy report on the issue, to be found here. Whilst even the short version comes in over 100 pages, it's not hard to follow and is an essential, and under-reported part of the story. Please check it out.
Post a Comment